← 2025 Paper 2

UPSC 2025 Maths Optional Paper 2 Q1a — Step-by-Step Solution

10 marks · Section A

Cosets and Lagrange's theorem · Algebra · asked 5× in 14 yrs · Read the full method →

Question

Let HH and KK be two subgroups of a group GG such that o(H)>o(G)o(H) > \sqrt{o(G)} and o(K)>o(G)o(K) > \sqrt{o(G)}. Show that H∩K≠{e}H \cap K \neq \{e\}, where ee is the identity element. Here o(H)o(H), o(K)o(K) and o(G)o(G) denote the order of HH, KK and GG respectively.

Technique

Count using the product-set order formula ∣HK∣=∣H∣ ∣K∣∣H∩K∣|HK| = \dfrac{|H|\,|K|}{|H\cap K|} together with the bound ∣HK∣≤∣G∣|HK| \le |G|.

Solution

Since H,KH,K are finite subgroups of GG, consider the product set

HK={ hk:h∈H, k∈K }.HK = \{\, hk : h\in H,\ k\in K \,\}.

Step 1 — Order of the product set. For finite subgroups H,KH,K of GG,

∣HK∣=∣H∣ ∣K∣∣H∩K∣.(∗)|HK| = \frac{|H|\,|K|}{|H\cap K|}. \tag{$\ast$}

Proof of (∗)(\ast). Define a map from H×KH\times K onto HKHK by (h,k)↦hk(h,k)\mapsto hk. For a fixed product g=hkg=hk, the pairs (h′,k′)(h',k') with h′k′=hkh'k'=hk are exactly h′=ht, k′=t−1kh' = ht,\ k' = t^{-1}k for t∈H∩Kt\in H\cap K (since h′k′=hk⇒h−1h′=k(k′)−1=:t∈H∩Kh'k'=hk \Rightarrow h^{-1}h' = k(k')^{-1} =: t \in H\cap K). Thus every element of HKHK has exactly ∣H∩K∣|H\cap K| preimages, so

∣H×K∣=∣HK∣⋅∣H∩K∣  ⟹  ∣HK∣=∣H∣ ∣K∣∣H∩K∣.|H\times K| = |HK|\cdot |H\cap K| \implies |HK| = \frac{|H|\,|K|}{|H\cap K|}.

Step 2 — Bound the product set. Although HKHK need not be a subgroup (since GG may be non-Abelian), it is a subset of GG, so

∣HK∣≤∣G∣=o(G).(∗∗)|HK| \le |G| = o(G). \tag{$\ast\ast$}

Step 3 — Combine. Suppose, for contradiction, that H∩K={e}H\cap K = \{e\}, i.e. ∣H∩K∣=1|H\cap K| = 1. Then by (∗)(\ast),

∣HK∣=∣H∣ ∣K∣=o(H) o(K).|HK| = |H|\,|K| = o(H)\,o(K).

Using the hypotheses o(H)>o(G)o(H) > \sqrt{o(G)} and o(K)>o(G)o(K) > \sqrt{o(G)},

∣HK∣=o(H) o(K)>o(G)⋅o(G)=o(G).|HK| = o(H)\,o(K) > \sqrt{o(G)}\cdot\sqrt{o(G)} = o(G).

This contradicts (∗∗)(\ast\ast), namely ∣HK∣≤o(G)|HK| \le o(G).

Hence the assumption is false, and

∣H∩K∣>1,i.e.H∩K≠{e}.■|H\cap K| > 1, \quad\text{i.e.}\quad H\cap K \neq \{e\}. \qquad \blacksquare

Answer

H∩K≠{e}H\cap K \neq \{e\}. The proof rests on ∣HK∣=o(H) o(K)∣H∩K∣≤o(G)|HK| = \dfrac{o(H)\,o(K)}{|H\cap K|} \le o(G); if the intersection were trivial, o(H) o(K)>o(G)o(H)\,o(K) > o(G) would force ∣HK∣>o(G)|HK| > o(G), which is impossible.

We post more of this — worked solutions, CSAT trap breakdowns, guide chapters — a few times a week on Telegram. Free, no sign-in. Join

This solution is part of the Maths Coverage Map — 14 years, mapped. Get the take-away PDF free.