The math optional, made finite.

← 2025 Paper 2

UPSC Maths 2025 Paper 2 Q1a — Solution

10 marks · Section A

Question

Let HH and KK be two subgroups of a group GG such that o(H)>o(G)o(H) > \sqrt{o(G)} and o(K)>o(G)o(K) > \sqrt{o(G)}. Show that HK{e}H \cap K \neq \{e\}, where ee is the identity element. Here o(H)o(H), o(K)o(K) and o(G)o(G) denote the order of HH, KK and GG respectively.

Technique

Count using the product-set order formula HK=HKHK|HK| = \dfrac{|H|\,|K|}{|H\cap K|} together with the bound HKG|HK| \le |G|.

Solution

Since H,KH,K are finite subgroups of GG, consider the product set HK={hk:hH, kK}.HK = \{\, hk : h\in H,\ k\in K \,\}.

Step 1 — Order of the product set. For finite subgroups H,KH,K of GG, |HK| = \frac{|H|\,|K|}{|H\cap K|}. \tag{$\ast$}

Proof of ()(\ast). Define a map from H×KH\times K onto HKHK by (h,k)hk(h,k)\mapsto hk. For a fixed product g=hkg=hk, the pairs (h,k)(h',k') with hk=hkh'k'=hk are exactly h=ht, k=t1kh' = ht,\ k' = t^{-1}k for tHKt\in H\cap K (since hk=hkh1h=k(k)1=:tHKh'k'=hk \Rightarrow h^{-1}h' = k(k')^{-1} =: t \in H\cap K). Thus every element of HKHK has exactly HK|H\cap K| preimages, so H×K=HKHK    HK=HKHK.|H\times K| = |HK|\cdot |H\cap K| \implies |HK| = \frac{|H|\,|K|}{|H\cap K|}.

Step 2 — Bound the product set. Although HKHK need not be a subgroup (since GG may be non-Abelian), it is a subset of GG, so |HK| \le |G| = o(G). \tag{$\ast\ast$}

Step 3 — Combine. Suppose, for contradiction, that HK={e}H\cap K = \{e\}, i.e. HK=1|H\cap K| = 1. Then by ()(\ast), HK=HK=o(H)o(K).|HK| = |H|\,|K| = o(H)\,o(K). Using the hypotheses o(H)>o(G)o(H) > \sqrt{o(G)} and o(K)>o(G)o(K) > \sqrt{o(G)}, HK=o(H)o(K)>o(G)o(G)=o(G).|HK| = o(H)\,o(K) > \sqrt{o(G)}\cdot\sqrt{o(G)} = o(G). This contradicts ()(\ast\ast), namely HKo(G)|HK| \le o(G).

Hence the assumption is false, and HK>1,i.e.HK{e}.|H\cap K| > 1, \quad\text{i.e.}\quad H\cap K \neq \{e\}. \qquad \blacksquare

Answer

HK{e}H\cap K \neq \{e\}. The proof rests on HK=o(H)o(K)HKo(G)|HK| = \dfrac{o(H)\,o(K)}{|H\cap K|} \le o(G); if the intersection were trivial, o(H)o(K)>o(G)o(H)\,o(K) > o(G) would force HK>o(G)|HK| > o(G), which is impossible.

We've mapped all 13 years of this exam. Get new solutions, tools, and guides as we release them — free.