Continuity of Functions on R; Epsilon-Delta
At a Glance
- Frequency: 2 sub-parts across 2 of 14 years (2018, 2026)
- Priority tier: T4
- Marks (count): 15 (1)
- Average solve time: ~18 min
- Difficulty mix: medium 1
- Section: B | Dominant type: proof
Why This Chapter Matters
This atom appears once in 13 years (2018, 15 marks) and is rated T4, so it is not a priority-one topic. However, the - technique underpins every continuity argument in the paper, and UPSC’s question type is tightly predictable: prove continuity or discontinuity of a specific function from the definition. Mastering the template here pays dividends in related atoms (uniform continuity, P2-RA-09; properties on compact sets, P2-RA-10).
Minimum Theory
Definition (Continuity at a point). Let and . Then is continuous at if
Sequential characterisation. is continuous at if and only if for every sequence with we have .
Discontinuity via sequences. To prove is discontinuous at , it suffices to exhibit a sequence such that .
Algebra of continuous functions. If and are continuous at , so are , , and (provided ). Composition: if is continuous at and is continuous at , then is continuous at .
Classifying a discontinuity. At a point where fails to be continuous:
- First kind (jump): both one-sided limits exist and are finite but disagree (or disagree with ). The jump is . If the two one-sided limits agree with each other but not with , the discontinuity is removable.
- Second kind: at least one one-sided limit fails to exist — typically by oscillation.
Naming which kind you have, and producing both one-sided limits, is what separates a full answer from “it is discontinuous there”.
Functions defined as a pointwise limit — the trichotomy. When is defined by with built from an -th power, the limit is governed entirely by the base against . For with :
so . The three branches must all be taken, including the endpoint if the base can vanish. The resulting is a step function, and the question then reduces to locating where the base crosses . No - work is involved — the limit is evaluated case-wise and the continuity verdict is read off the steps.
Key examples.
- is continuous everywhere (polynomial).
- is continuous everywhere; works by the reverse triangle inequality.
- Dirichlet function is discontinuous everywhere.
- for , : continuous at (squeeze theorem).
Proving continuity of at . For ,
Restrict so that implies , giving . Then
Choose . Then .
Question Archetypes
| Archetype | Recognition |
|---|---|
| prove-continuity | ”Prove is continuous at using the - definition.” |
| prove-discontinuity | ”Prove is discontinuous at .“ |
| piecewise-analysis | ”Investigate continuity of a piecewise-defined function.” |
| limit-function-discontinuities | is defined as a pointwise limit of -th powers; find its points of discontinuity |
prove-continuity (1 question(s); 2018)
Recognition Cues
- A specific function is named (polynomial, , , , etc.).
- Asked to verify continuity using the - definition.
Solution Template
- Write out explicitly.
- Factor or bound the expression to isolate .
- Impose a preliminary bound (or another convenient constant) to control the remaining factor.
- Choose where is the bound on the other factor.
- Verify: .
Worked Example
2018 Paper 2, 2018-P2-Q2a (15 marks)
Using the - definition, prove that is continuous at every point .
Proof.
Let and be given. We need to find such that
Observe that
Preliminary bound. Assume first that , so . Then
and by the triangle inequality,
Choice of . Set
Verification. For ,
Since was arbitrary and depends only on and , is continuous at . As was arbitrary, is continuous on .
Common Traps
- Choosing without first imposing a preliminary bound; this leaves the factor unbounded and the proof invalid.
- Writing without the with ; then the preliminary bound need not hold.
- Confusing pointwise continuity (here, may depend on ) with uniform continuity (where depends only on ). For , the dependence on is essential — uniform continuity fails on all of .
limit-function-discontinuities (1 question(s); 2026)
The opposite question type to prove-continuity: nothing here is done by -. The function is handed to you as a limit, you evaluate that limit case-wise into a step function, and then you find — not verify — the discontinuity set. Expect the answer to be an infinite set.
Recognition Cues
- "" with appearing as an exponent.
- The deliverable is “find the points of discontinuity”, i.e. a set, not a yes/no.
- The domain is an open interval — and the openness is usually load-bearing.
Solution Template
- Name the base and record its range. If can be , say so and check the printed expression is still defined at every .
- Apply the trichotomy , , and collapse to a closed form (typically a sign or step function).
- Locate the breakpoints — where the base crosses — in terms of . Substituting or similar is usually the cleanest route.
- Determine the sign on each interval between breakpoints, so that is described completely.
- Continuity off the breakpoints: is locally constant there, hence continuous — one line.
- Discontinuity at each breakpoint: compute both one-sided limits, show they differ, and classify the jump. This is where the marks concentrate.
- Check the endpoints of the domain. An open interval excludes points that would otherwise belong to the answer.
Worked Example
2026 Paper 2, 2026-P2-Q1c (10 marks)
Find the points of discontinuity of defined by .
Source: analysis/solutions/2026-P2-Q1c.md
Step 1 — The base. Put and . Since we have , so and the denominator : the printed quotient is well defined for every and every . (Worth a line — does vanish, e.g. at where .)
Step 2 — Trichotomy. ; ; (including , where for all ). Hence
Step 3 — Breakpoints. With , as runs over , runs over . Then , and forces , giving
Note (which would come from ) is not in the open interval.
Step 4 — Signs. For we have , where has constant sign . So there, and on .
Step 5 — Continuity off . Any lies in one of these open intervals, on which is constant; a function constant on a neighbourhood of a point is continuous at it.
Step 6 — Discontinuity on . Fix , . Then , while
the right-hand interval being non-empty precisely because . The two one-sided limits are and in some order, so does not exist: a first-kind (jump) discontinuity of jump , with sitting at the midpoint — so it is irremovable however is redefined.
Two structural remarks the phrasing invites. is countably infinite and accumulates only at , which is not in the domain; so every point of is isolated in , and on any with there are only finitely many discontinuities (hence is Riemann integrable there). Had the domain been , the point would be a far worse, second-kind discontinuity — oscillates between in every neighbourhood of .
Common Traps
- Doing only two branches. Omitting (where ) yields a different and wrong discontinuity set. All three cases must appear.
- Forgetting that the base can be . The third branch must be stated as , not ”, geometric” — genuinely occurs.
- Including . Writing imports a point outside the open interval. The openness of is doing real work at both ends.
- Stopping at “discontinuous at ”. The question asks for the points and expects proof at each; the two one-sided limits and the classification are the marks.
- Reaching for -. There is nothing to do with it here. The limit is evaluated case-wise; continuity off follows from local constancy in one line.
Marks-Aware Writing
At 15 marks, write a complete proof with every logical step made explicit: state given, state the goal, show the algebra, make the preliminary bound, choose , verify the implication, and close with “since was arbitrary.” Skipping any of these steps risks losing 3–5 marks. Roughly: setup and algebra — 4 marks; preliminary bound and choice — 5 marks; verification — 4 marks; conclusion — 2 marks.
Practice Set
Only one historical question on this atom (shown above).